Learning from other disciplines - the medical profession
This briefing defines impact analysis and evidence-based practice (EBP). It compares the use of randomised controlled trials (RCT) to measure the impact of interventions in the medical and guidance professions, highlighting the benefits and limitations of this approach in the different contexts. The conclusion is that the nature of guidance-related research lends itself to less scientific approaches. However, the methods adopted to measure impact at an organisational or national level may be more comparable
- Can the guidance community learn anything about impact from other disciplines?
-
- Can the guidance community learn about impact from other disciplines.doc
-
98.00 Kb
This briefing paper introduces the concepts of impact analysis and evidence-based practice (EBP). Drawing on two empirical examples, it compares the use of randomised controlled trials to measure the impact of interventions in the medical and guidance professions, highlighting the benefits and limitations of the approach.
Last modified
2004-09-06 02:17 PM
Last cached: 2008-07-25 11:44 PM
Last cached: 2008-07-25 11:44 PM