Discussions: A business perspective of careers guidance
This lively discussion debates the role of careers guidance in relation to economic needs and benefits. The underlying question is around where priorities lie. Is there a conflict between meeting the needs of the individual and meeting the needs of the economy? If so which should take precedence?
Questions discussed include:
- Should careers advisers resist becoming social engineers, concentrating instead on empowering clients?
- Should LMI dominate the career decision process or simply be seen as another piece of relevant information?
- Can we afford courses that have little market value?
- What is the point of gaining qualifications and experience in an occupational route that is in decline or has few opportunities in your travel to work area?
- Is there a need for career choice to be informed by the wider context of the needs of the economy?
- Is a maths degree of any more vocational value than a media degree?
- Why should an individual invest in occupationally specific training if the only incentive is to become part of a flexible work force on a temporary contract knowing that they can be dismissed as soon as their services are no longer needed?
Last modified
2007-06-10 03:08 PM
Last cached: 2008-05-06 12:43 PM
Last cached: 2008-05-06 12:43 PM